Project: Kings Valley, Nevada
Quick Facts
| Location | Humboldt County, northern Nevada |
| Lithium Deposit Size (Historical) |
11 million tonnes lithium carbonate equivalent(1) (historical estimate based on exploration work by Chevron Resources during the 1970s and 1980s). |
| Lithium Resource Size (NI 43-101) at 0.40% Lithium cut-off grade Detailed Resource Table Conversion Table |
Stage I Indicated Resources: 10 million tonnes grading 0.43% lithium Lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) - 230,500 tonnes Inferred Resources: 10 million tonnes grading 0.42% lithium LCE - 231,000 tonnes Stage II Indicated Resources: 95 million tonnes grading 0.27% lithium Lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) - 1,365,000 tonnes Inferred Resources: 47 million tonnes grading 0.26% lithium LCE - 650,000 tonnes |
| Lithium Deposit Layout | Spread over five mineralized lenses (Stages I to V) running approx. 30 kilometres from the southern to the northern edges of the lenses. |
| Development Plan | Stage I resource potentially supports production at 27,700 tonnes per year LCE and 115,000 tonnes per year of potassium sulphate. Stages II to V lithium bearing deposits envisioned to support staged development. |
| Stage I Preliminary Assessment and Economic Evaluation (PAEE) (NI 43-101) |
|
| Mining | Near surface deposit |
| Infrastructure |
|
| Planned Stage I Timeline | Permitting and Environmental Studies - ongoing Pilot studies and additional drilling results - 2010 Prefeasibility Study - 2011 Production - 2014 |
| Advantages |
|
(1) Based on a 1983 non NI43-101 compliant report prepared by Chevron Resources (the "Chevron Report"). Western Lithium cautions readers not to place undue reliance on the content and conclusions of the Chevron Report, which was not prepared in compliance with National Instrument 43-101. The Chevron Report uses terminology other than those approved by Canadian Institute of Mining Guidelines.
(2) The preliminary assessment is preliminary in nature, and includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the preliminary assessment will be realized. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
